Deprecated: Hook custom_css_loaded is deprecated since version jetpack-13.5! Use WordPress Custom CSS instead. Jetpack no longer supports Custom CSS. Read the WordPress.org documentation to learn how to apply custom styles to your site: https://wordpress.org/documentation/article/styles-overview/#applying-custom-css in /sites/mpsg.interplay.design/files/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078
Soybean Seed Treatments: Assessing Your Risk – Manitoba Pulse & Soybean Growers

Soybean Seed Treatments: Assessing Your Risk

The following risk assessment was developed to help farmers and agronomists identify where seed treatments are most likely to be beneficial by describing the factors that influence soil insect populations and fungal pathogens. The targeted use of seed treatments supports an integrated pest management approach, which takes into consideration both economic and environmental factors.

For each soybean field, review the risk factors and considerations outlined in the table below to determine your risk of early-season insect pests. If your risk is low, consider ordering and planting fungicide-only, or bare seed.

In 2021, Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) released its review decisions on the neonicotinoid pesticides, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid. Use of imidacloprid (Stress Shield 600, Alias 240 SC, Sombrero 600FS) in pulse and soybean crops remains the same, with some label amendments for safe handling and disposal of treated seed. The maximum use rate for thiamethoxam (Cruiser 5FS) in soybean seed treatments has been reduced to 30 g.a.i/100 kg seed, which will cancel its use for wireworms.

CONSIDERATIONS FOR USING A FUNGICIDE-ONLY SEED TREATMENT:

For each soybean field, review the risk factors and considerations to determine your risk of seedling diseases and root rots. Prevention strategies include crop rotation and genetic resistance of soybean varieties (if available). It is important to remember that seed treatment is only effective until the very early V-stages.

It is difficult to distinguish root rot pathogens from one another. Shared symptoms include poor emergence and root development, yellowing, discoloured roots and lesions on the root or stem tissue near the soil line.

On-Farm Network Research Highlights

While there are proven scouting techniques and economic thresholds for several foliar pests, farmers have very few tools to estimate risk from soil-borne pests. As a result, seed treatments are frequently applied on a just-in-case basis with little knowledge of the risk soil-borne pests actually pose to a given crop. With the cost of common seed treatments ranging from $6–18/ac, optimizing the seed treatment decision would be a positive step toward profitable and sustainable soybean production.

Fourty-three On-Farm Network soybean field trials were established in Manitoba comparing treated versus untreated seed (2015 to 2019). Seed treatments consisted of either fungicide + insecticide or fungicide alone. The objective of these trials were to examine the decision to treat seed versus planting untreated seed when armed with minimal knowledge of the risk from soil-borne pests. Over the five years of this research, applying seed treatments as a form of self-insurance prevented yield loss 19% of the time. Positive yield responses occurred in 2015 and 2016.

There was no specific factor (seeding date, crop establishment, previous crop) that corresponded to the sites with a positive economic response. To view individual trial reports for these trials, visit mpsg.interplay.design/on-farm-network.

At one trial in 2016 (2016-SST10), wet spring conditions led to excessive root rot and drown outs in the field, reducing plant stands. Under these challenging conditions, a yield response of 2.3 bu/ac was observed.

The use of seed treatments should be evaluated on a field-by-field basis, considering the risk factors above that would warrant a seed treatment.

 

Updated April 2022